Submitted Comments
The Alliance submitted comments and recommendations to CMS’s proposed CY2021 Physician Fee Schedule. Our comments:
- Oppose cuts in payment for surgical procedures and physical therapy services and urged the Agency to prevent drastic cuts from occurring while physicians are still trying to recover and gain their financial footing from the effects of the pandemic.
- Urge CMS to not only accept the RUC recommendations for the values of E/M codes, as they have proposed, but to also apply these updated values to the global procedure codes. We flagged that implementing new values for E/M codes when billed independently - but not implementing those same values in the global packages - disrupts the relativity in the entire physician fee schedule and creates specialty differentials even when performing the same work.
- Recommend that the Agency consider creating a MIPS Value Pathway (MVPs) for Chronic Wound Management and utilize the QCDR measures which already exist for wound care.
- Encourage CMS to maintain a patient’s home as an originating site even when the Public Health Emergency expires.
See additional recommendations and suggestions to CMS in the full-text of Alliance comments, below.
- Eliminate the new code C1849 – synthetic skin substitutes resorbable and require any synthetic skin substitute to apply for an appropriate HCPCS Q code to be considered a “skin substitute.”
- Remove placement of the C1849 synthetic skin substitute products from the high cost tier.
- Change the current “skin substitute” terminology to “cellular and or tissue based products for skin wounds."
See additional recommendations submitted to CMS in the full-text letter, below.
- The codes that should be utilized by Provider Based Departments (PBD) when billing for wound care services via telehealth that has been temporarily relocated to a patient’s home
- Competitive bidding program concerns
- Temporary relocation sites
- The Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) program
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Program Relief
- LCD/DME issues
Read Alliance press release
See Alliance Comment
Read Alliance comments
READ ALLIANCE LETTER
As hospitals and health systems are directed to halt all elective and “non essential” services as part of COVID-19 response, a concerning number have categorized wound care services and procedures as “non essential” – leaving a fragile cohort of chronic wound patients at risk. The Alliance developed a position statement to help health systems and providers avoid unintended consequences for wound patients amid the realities of the COVID-19 pandemic: “Wound Care is an Essential, Not Elective, Service that Prevents Hospital Admissions and ED Visits Among a Fragile Cohort of Patients at High-Risk of Mortality from COVID-19.”
See Alliance COVID-19 Resources for Wound Care
READ FULL STATEMENT